What’s your credit score? Depends on who’s keeping track
Have you ever been in a restaurant when a mismatched couple openly feuded a few tables away from you? You weren’t directly affected by the sparring match, but chances are it was uncomfortable because you were trapped in the same eatery and forced to witness the whole sordid affair.
Well, the always strange bedfellows of Fair Isaac, the mastermind behind the FICO score the credit reporting agencies (who are themselves made up of an odd alliance of TransUnion, Equifax and Experian) are at it again. Worse, we, as credit consumers, are all trapped in the same restaurant with little hope of escaping their quarrel. Whether the fuedin’ twosome will merely frustrate us or make us very uncomfortable remains to be seem.
The pair have always had a co-dependant, can’t-live-with-them-can’t-live-without them relationship. The credit bureaus keep a detailed record of your credit history. But the problem is, when a potential lender wants to check a client’s credit, they don’t want to filter through pages of raw data to determine if the client was a good credit risk. So to help with this, Fair Isaac developed several algorithms to crunch this information and develop a numeric score to represent a person’s credit risk. The FICO score usually ranges from 300 to 850, the higher the number the better someone’s credit was.
While this arrangement is convenient for potential lenders, it wrangles the credit bureaus who have to pay Fair Isaac to use the bureaus’ own data and assign a number to it. The credit bureaus reasoned that it would be much easier (and a lot more profitable) if they developed their own scoring system, and weren’t forced to siphon off part of their profits to a third-party company.
Enter VantageScore, developed by the credit bureaus themselves. Like the FICO score, the new scoring system assigns a number value to your credit history. VantageScore’s points range from 501 to 990. Additionally, the score is assigned a grade designed to give creditors and consumers an easy way to know how good their credit is.
For example, a score between 990 and 901 represents an “A”, a score between 801 and 900 a “B”, a score between 701 and 800 a “C” and so on, down to a failing grade of an F.
The VantageScore system is currently in the test phase and is not currently in use. But once the system goes on-line, the bureaus are hoping lenders will stop using the FICO scores and switch to VantageScore, enabling them to keep their profits.
Though VantageScore was launched as a strike against Fair Isaac, it is easy to see how the duel between the two parties could catch a few consumers in the cross-fire. First consumers will have to learn a new scoring system. After 50 years of dominance, consumers understand a FICO score of 745 is a good score. But the same number with the new system isn’t so hot.
Further, while both scoring systems use similar scoring Cciteria , there are differences between the two methodologies, so a consumer may have a better score on one system that an other.
What’s more, the VantageScore system promises lenders that the new system will do a better of job of rooting out bad credit risks than the FICCO system. Exactly how it does this has yet to be seen, but some financial analysts worry the tighter net for people with bad credit will also unfairly trap a those with an average or above average credit history.
But whatever happens, one thing seems clear—the fued between the co-dependant pair won’t go away soon. Currently, FICO is used by 80 percent of the banks and 75 percent of the mortgage companies; the credit bureaus will no doubt be fighting hard to claim their share of the market. How uncomfortable the fight for become for consumers, the hapless bystanders, is unclear.
By David Plowman




